Home > Spooky > 4 Facts Obama Cant Explain Away

4 Facts Obama Cant Explain Away


he lied

4 Simple Questions:

1. Back in 1961 people of color were called ‘Negroes.’ So how can the Obama ‘birth certificate’ state he is “African-American” when the term wasn’t even used at that time ?

2. The birth certificate that the White House released lists Obama’s birth as August 4, 1961 & Lists Barack Hussein Obama as his father. No big deal, Right ? At the time of Obama’s birth, it also shows that his father is aged 25 years old, and that Obama’s father was born in “Kenya , East Africa “.

This wouldn’t seem like anything of concern, except the fact that Kenya did not even exist until 1963, two whole years after Obama’s birth, and 27 years after his father’s birth. How could Obama’s father have been born in a country that did not yet Exist? Up and until Kenya was formed in 1963, it was known as the “British East Africa Protectorate”. (check it below)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenya_

3. On the Birth Certificate released by the White House, the listed place of birth is “Kapi’olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital”.  This cannot be, because the hospital(s) in question in 1961 were called “KauiKeolani Children’s Hospital” and “Kapi’olani Maternity Home”, Respectively.  The name did not change to Kapi’olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital until 1978, when these two hospitals merged.  How can this particular name of the hospital be on a birth certificate dated 1961 if this name had not yet been applied to it until 1978 ?
(CHECK IT BELOW)
(http://www.kapiolani.org/women-and-children/about-us/default.aspx)

4. Perhaps a clue comes from Obama’s book on his father. He states how proud he is of his father fighting in WW II. I’m not a math genius, so I may need some help from you. Barack Obama’s “birth certificate” says his father was 25 years old in 1961 when Obama was born. That should have put his father’s date of birth approximately 1936-if my math holds (Honest! I did That without a calculator!!!) Now we need a non-revised history book-one that hasn’t been altered to satisfy the author’s goals-to verify that WW II was basically between 1939 and 1945. Just how many 3 year olds fight in Wars? Even in the latest stages of WW II his father wouldn’t have been more than 9 years old.
Does that mean that Mr. Obama is a liar, or simply chooses to alter the facts to satisfy his imagination or political purposes ?

Why hasn’t this been discussed in the major media ?

Very truly yours,
Rich
RICHARD R. SILVERLIEB
Attorney at Law
354 Eisenhower Parkway
Livingston , NJ 07039

“A pen in the hand of this president is far more dangerous than a gun in the hands of 200 million law-abiding citizens.”

Advertisements
Categories: Spooky
  1. smrstrauss
    March 5, 2015 at 8:24 pm

    More than a year has passed since the article on this page was published, and Obama is still the President of the United States, and there have not even been calls for investigating his birth certificate in the US Congress. That’s because the article is false. The “Four Simple Questions” have all been answered, and the officials in Hawaii of both parties have repeatedly confirmed that they sent the short form and long form birth certificates to Obama and that every single fact on the copy of the long form that the White House put online is exactly the same as on what they sent to him.

    • March 5, 2015 at 8:59 pm

      The beauty of being a mindless shill is plausible denial ability. I don’t believe anything out of this administration, nor the ones before your boy…

  2. smrstrauss
    February 9, 2015 at 4:06 pm

    In about a month it will be a year since this article was posted, and Obama is still the President of the United States, and there have not even been calls to investigate his place of birth or his birth certificate or his Natural Born Citizen status in the US Congress. That is because the four questions that the article claims Obama cannot explain away HAVE been explained.

    Re: “In 1961 people of color were called “Negroes.” So how can the Obama “birth certificate” state he is “African-American” when the term wasn’t even used at that time?”

    ANSWER: First it does not say “African-American.” It says “African.” Only African.

    The explanation is simple. In Hawaii you were allowed to use any word you wanted to describe your race. There was no checklist, and no one stood over you saying what you had to enter. There are entries in Hawaii of people listing their race as “American.” So you were allowed to use any word you wanted.

    And what was the word that African exchange students commonly used to describe their race in the 1960s? Answer: African.

    Re: 2. “… Kenya did not even exist until 1963, two whole years after Obama’s birth, and 27 years after his father’s birth. How could Obama’s father have been born in a country that did not yet exist? Up and until Kenya was formed in 1963, it was known then as the “British East Africa Protectorate”.”

    Answer. You are out of date with that name. Kenya stopped being called the British East African Protectorate in 1920. In that year it was renamed. What was the name? THE KENYA COLONY.

    In short, it was called Kenya (Kenya short for “The Kenya Colony”), and it was in East Africa, so the entry Kenya, East Africa is correct.

    Re: “3. On the birth certificate released by the White House, the listed place of birth is “Kapi’olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital”. This cannot be, because the hospital(s) in question in 1961 were called “KauiKeolani Children’s Hospital” and “Kapi’olani Maternity Home”, respectively. ”

    Answer: You are referring to two other hospitals. But, Kapiolani Maternity and Gynecological Hospital DID exist in 1961.

    How do we know? Well, on WND’s site there are birth certificates for the Nordkye Twins, born one day after Obama in the same hospital, and what is the name of the hospital on their birth certificates? Answer: Kapiolani Maternity and Gynecological Hospital.

    Finally, Obama’s book clearly says that his GRANDfather fought in WWII, and in fact his GRANDfather really did fight in WWII. Obama’s book did not say, nor did Obama (though there is a forged video that claims that he said it) that his father, who was indeed too young to fight in WWII, fought in WWII. Once again, his book says GRANDfather. It does not say “father.” (Why not check out these things before posting???)

  3. smrstrauss
    March 21, 2014 at 2:56 pm

    Re: “First I was issued 1 SSN just like YOU. Clerks file what is submitted, don’t be a fool.”

    Actually, you have to look into your FILE. If and when you do, you may find several different SS numbers generated over the years by SS clerks.

    http://www.securityworldnews.com/2010/08/12/20-million-americans-have-multiple-social-security-numbers-associated-with-their-name/

    Re: “hell you know more about them than I do,…”

    So? (It is clear that you are poorly informed.)

    Re: “So you didn’t answer the question AGAIN – WHAT DO YOU HAVE TO GAIN BY DEFENDING OBAMA???”

    Answer. I’m not defending Obama. I am refuting birther LIES. It amuses me to do so. What you, and rational people, should ask is what is the motive——what do birther sites have to gain–by making all of these lies:

    (1) Birthers said that Obama’s draft card was forged, and indeed it was forged, but Obama did not post his draft card, nor did any representative of Obama—so who do you think forged it? (Okay, I’ll make it easy—the guy who posted it.)

    (2) Birthers have said that Obama became a citizen of Indonesia—but a telephone call to the Indonesian Embassy shows that he was never an Indonesian citizen. Why do you suppose that the birthers did not call the Indonesian embassy to check?

    (3) Birthers said that Obama’s Kenyan grandmother said that he was born in Kenya—but the transcript of the call shows that she said that he was BORN IN HAWAII—why do you suppose they did not quote her accurately and in fact cut off the tape recording of the call on their sites just before she said “born in Hawaii, where his father was studying at the time.” Why do you suppose they did that?

    (4) Birther sites did not tell you about SS Administration clerks making lots of mistakes and that a single digit entered wrong in the zip code would generated a SS number from a place other than where it was applied from. Why do you suppose they did not tell you that?

    (5) Birther sites did not tell their readers that the Kenyan government said that Obama was NOT born there. Why do you suppose they did not tell their readers that?

    (6) Birther sites did not even tell their readers that there is no evidence that Obama’s mother had a passport in 1961—or how very few 18-year-olds did in those days, or how EXTREMELY few women traveled abroad late in pregnancy in those days because of the high risk of stillbirth. Why do you suppose they did not tell you that?

    (7) Birther sites posted videos of Obama that claimed to show that he said “I was born in Kenya”—but you cannot see his mouth move and the originals of those videos have been found, and they do not say “I was born in Kenya..”” Why do you suppose that they forged and posted those videos? (Ditto, by the way, for three forged “Kenyan birth certificates.” And what do you suppose was the motive for forging them??)

    (8) Birther sites said that Obama spent “millions” on hiding his birth certificate. But Obama showed his birth certificate and did not spend a cent on hiding anything. And in fact, as birther sites did not tell their readers, there wasn’t even one lawsuit for Obama’s birth certificate or for records, not one. There were lawsuits to keep Obama off of ballots, but NO lawsuits for his birth certificate or records of any kind. Why do you suppose that birther sites implied that there were lawsuits for Obama’s BC—when there weren’t ANY???

    (9) Birther sites said that Obama’s records are “sealed,” but they are not sealed. They are covered under the ordinary state and federal privacy laws, and Mitt Romney and John McCain and previous presidents did not release similar records either. In fact, no president or presidential candidate has released his school or college transcripts (a few showed grade point averages). Bush’s transcript, BTW, was leaked by Yale, but Bush did not release it. And Clinton and Reagan and Carter and Ford and Nixon and LBJ, etc., etc.—-did not show their school or college records either.

    And (10) the constant repetition ‘the birth certificates are forged,” and “anyone can see that the birth certificates are forged”—are all birther lies too. And they have the same motives as the lies shown above.

    Birthers have not shown all the real experts who have said that there is nothing wrong with Obama’s birth certificate, nor have they told the readers on birther sites that the officials in Hawaii of BOTH parties have repeatedly confirmed that they sent the birth certificates to Obama and confirmed ALL the facts on the copy that the White House put online are EXACTLY the same as on what they sent to him. And they have not explained the research on the Xerox Workstation either:

    http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2013/11/blogger-shows-obama-birth-certificate-artifacts-caused-by-xerox-machine-no-joy-in-birtherville/

    In short, it is just another birther LIE.

  4. smrstrauss
    March 21, 2014 at 7:45 am

    Re: “So it’s OK to give out a FAKE NUMBER then go back and give out another number and tell us this one is better.
    How many SSN were YOU
    issued???????????????????”

    First, recall that Obama’s SS number WAS NOT Ludwig’s number as claimed. The two are different numbers, so Obama did not “steal” Ludwig’s number.

    Second, the claim that it was a false number. NO, it wasn’t. The CT SS number was caused by a data entry error. (Did you think that Social Security clerks never made mistakes in entering data? Did you think that when a SS clerk entered the zip code of the applicant wrong it would not generate a SS number from a place other than where the application was made???)

    Well, Obama’s address in Hawaii was in zip code 96814, and the zip code for Danbury, CT. is 06814.

    Re: “How many SSN were YOU issued???????????????????”

    Answer: How many were you issued? Have you checked? It turns out that millions upon millions of people were issued multiple SS numbers and incorrect numbers due mainly to SS clerk data entry errors. (Did you think that they never made mistakes???)

    http://www.securityworldnews.com/2010/08/12/20-million-americans-have-multiple-social-security-numbers-associated-with-their-name/

    Re: “people like you will not change even when empirical evidence raises questions to what should never been arisen…”

    Answer: The main cause of your nightmares has been the repeated LIES by birther sites.

    For example:

    1) Birthers said that Obama’s draft card was forged, and indeed it was forged, but Obama did not post his draft card, nor did any representative of Obama—so who do you think forged it? (Okay, I’ll make it easy—the guy who posted it.)

    (2) Birthers have said that Obama became a citizen of Indonesia—but a telephone call to the Indonesian Embassy shows that he was never an Indonesian citizen. Why do you suppose that the birthers did not call the Indonesian embassy to check?

    (3) Birthers said that Obama’s Kenyan grandmother said that he was born in Kenya—but the transcript of the call shows that she said that he was BORN IN HAWAII—why do you suppose they did not quote her accurately and in fact cut off the tape recording of the call on their sites just before she said “born in Hawaii, where his father was studying at the time.” Why do you suppose they did that?

    (4) Birther sites did not tell you about SS Administration clerks making lots of mistakes and that a single digit entered wrong in the zip code would generated a SS number from a place other than where it was applied from. Why do you suppose they did not tell you that?

    And then, of course, there are the “four facts” that the original article was about: the claim that a birth certificate could not say “African”—when in Hawaii you could use any word you wanted to describe your race. The claim that Kenya did not exist in 1961—when it had been called The Kenya Colony since 1920. The claim that Kapolani Hospital had a different name from on Obama’s birth certificate (when the birth certificates for the Nordyke Twins who were born one day later shows exactly the same hospital name), and the complete lie that Obama’s book said that his father fought in WWII, when the book clearly says his GRANDFATHER fought in WWII.

    And then there was the claim that Obama used Ludwig’s SS number, when 042-68-4425 is not the same as 045-26-8722.

  5. smrstrauss
    March 12, 2014 at 9:38 am

    Obamacare stops insurance companies from denying coverage to people with pre-existing conditions and allows children to be covered on their parents’ insurance policies until the age of 26, and ultimately it will bring insurance coverage to 35-45 MILLION Americans who did not have insurance before. Obama got us out of Iraq and will get us out of Afghanistan, in contrast to George W. Bush who got us into both of those wars. Obama provided cash to keep GM and Chrysler afloat, and ultimately they paid the USA back for those loans and equity purchases AT A PROFIT to the USA. Obama tightened regulations on keeping the air clean and the water clean, in contrast to George Bush, who weakened those regulations.

    Re: “what is that suppose to mean if “anything were to happen to him” is that some racist remark your hiding behind? ”

    Answer: Don’t be gullible. Perhaps you are not one of them, but there are people who do want something to happen to Obama. They should know that first, what they desire is immoral, and second if anything were to happen to Obama, Biden would take over, and the conservatives would hate him even more than Obama.

    • March 12, 2014 at 1:32 pm

      First off we all know if your boy obama was shot dead in the streets he would be considered a mater, we all know that and have thought it. But here you go again on skin color on not ideology – he is a liberal socialist and that is what we want to die.

      Just look at Detroit – your prize – I have friends from their that live here in Dallas, they say Obama and the dems fucked that city over. GM is not at a profit idiot – they refused to pay back the loan and told the gov to fuck off since they want to go privet. Where do you get your info, oh yea MSLSD.
      You sound like Obama between the two ferns- stupid and confused – is that what you call drone wars hahaha. Tell your story to your blind ass buddies that shit will not fly here…

  6. smrstrauss
    March 6, 2014 at 5:56 pm

    Re: “TROLL… so who’s ass did you climb into to pull out such trivial nuggets of “so called proof”

    Notice that damdems has not responded to the facts? This is one example of why Ann Coulter, Glenn Beck and the National Review all call birthers CRAZY. The facts shown above are examples of the many reasons why Huckabee and Gingrich and Santorum and Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan do not believe birthers. It is why the US Congress voted to confirm Obama’s election twice UNANIMOUSLY—and that includes the votes of Rep. Michele Bachmann and Rep. Ron Paul.

  7. smrstrauss
    March 5, 2014 at 7:10 pm

    Re links to sources:

    Here is a link to SOME (by no means all) of the documents in which the officials of the government of Hawaii (officials of BOTH parties) repeatedly confirm that Obama was born in Hawaii and that they sent birth certificates from Hawaii to Obama and that ALL the facts on the birth certificate put online by the White House are exactly the same, repeat EXACTLY the same, as on what they sent to him:

    http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2013/01/heres-the-birth-certificate/

  8. February 19, 2014 at 10:16 pm

    Birthers and two-fers were not able to convince a single member of the US Electoral College to change her or his vote to vote against Obama in either the 2008 or 2012 elections. Obama won 356 electoral votes in the 2008 general election, and 356 electors voted for him. He received 332 votes in the 2012 general election, and 332 electors voted for him. In short, not one single elector changed her or his vote—that is because not one of them believes the nutty birther claim that Obama was born outside of the USA or the loony birther constitutional theory that two citizen parents are required. And ditto for the US Congress, which confirmed Obama’s election UNANIMOUSLY twice, and that included the votes of Rep. Michele Bachmann and Rep. Ron Paul). Why did they vote that way? Because not one of them thinks that Obama was born in a foreign country (which is a truly loony idea) or that two citizen parents are required in order to be a Natural Born US citizen.

    • February 20, 2014 at 2:57 am

      For one I would think your parents should be Natural Born Citizens, then their is no dispute the heritage. Only a fool such as yourself would take the time to BS your way around facts. Nice try to spin your crap with diversion tactics – is that all you really have? I mean how many of that Idiotic Electoral College feels like they regret voting for this dictator. Oh, and how smart are those jackass anyway that they get all the power. What type of system do we really have?

      • smrstrauss
        March 5, 2014 at 7:18 pm

        The meaning of Natural Born Citizen really does come from the common law (not from Vattel or “I for one think…”), and it really does include every child born in the USA except for the children of foreign diplomats and enemy invaders.

        “Under the longstanding English common-law principle of jus soli, persons born within the territory of the sovereign (other than children of enemy aliens or foreign diplomats) are citizens from birth. Thus, those persons born within the United States are “natural born citizens” and eligible to be President. Much less certain, however, is whether children born abroad of United States citizens are “natural born citizens” eligible to serve as President …”—- Edwin Meese, et al, THE HERITAGE GUIDE TO THE CONSTITUTION (2005) [Edwin Meese was Ronald Reagan’s attorney general, and the Heritage Foundation is a well-known Conservative organization.]

  9. February 9, 2014 at 11:58 am

    Re: “In 1961 people of color were called “Negroes.” So how can the Obama “birth certificate” state he is “African-American” when the term wasn’t even used at that time?”

    ANSWER: First it does not say “African-American.” It says “African.” Only African.

    The explanation is simple. In Hawaii you were allowed to use any word you wanted to describe your race. There was no checklist, and no one stood over you saying what you had to enter. There are entries in Hawaii of people listing their race as “American.” So you were allowed to use any word you wanted.

    And what was the word that African exchange students commonly used to describe their race in the 1960s? Answer: African.

    Re: 2. “… Kenya did not even exist until 1963, two whole years after Obama’s birth, and 27 years after his father’s birth. How could Obama’s father have been born in a country that did not yet exist? Up and until Kenya was formed in 1963, it was known then as the “British East Africa Protectorate”.”

    Answer. You are out of date with that name. Kenya stopped being called the British East African Protectorate in 1920. In that year it was renamed. What was the name? THE KENYA COLONY.

    In short, it was called Kenya (Kenya short for “The Kenya Colony”), and it was in East Africa, so the entry Kenya, East Africa is correct.

    Re: “3. On the birth certificate released by the White House, the listed place of birth is “Kapi’olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital”. This cannot be, because the hospital(s) in question in 1961 were called “KauiKeolani Children’s Hospital” and “Kapi’olani Maternity Home”, respectively. ”

    Answer: You are referring to two other hospitals. But, Kapiolani Maternity and Gynecological Hospital DID exist in 1961.

    How do we know? Well, on WND’s site there are birth certificates for the Nordkye Twins, born one day after Obama in the same hospital, and what is the name of the hospital on their birth certificates? Answer: Kapiolani Maternity and Gynecological Hospital.

    As for the last question, Obama’s book simply does not say that his father was in WWII. It says that his GRANDfather was in WWII, and his grandfather really was in WWII. Perhaps someone who told you this failed to see the GRAND in GRANDfather. But, it is there. Why not check these very simple things before posting???

    • February 9, 2014 at 5:02 pm

      Spin misters can explain away anything in your world. You seen the links to base up the facts, if you choose to cite another source than list it, like the article cited for you…

      • smrstrauss
        March 5, 2014 at 7:19 pm

        See links above.

      • March 6, 2014 at 3:19 pm

        TROLL… so who’s ass did you climb into to pull out such trivial nuggets of “so called proof” you stupid fucks don’t get it. We don’t believe you, Obama, or anyone in this administration on anything you say. All your attempts to obfuscate the facts are telling how scared you are of the awakening of the people towards liberals in general and the socialist movement you embrace. I can tell you that here in TEXAS, we are not buying your BS and lies, just stay the fuck out of our freedom and go hide in your basement praying to your false god Obama.

      • smrstrauss
        March 6, 2014 at 5:57 pm

        Re: “TROLL… so who’s ass did you climb into to pull out such trivial nuggets of “so called proof”

        Notice that damdems has not responded to the facts? This is one example of why Ann Coulter, Glenn Beck and the National Review all call birthers CRAZY. The facts shown above are examples of the many reasons why Huckabee and Gingrich and Santorum and Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan do not believe birthers. It is why the US Congress voted to confirm Obama’s election twice UNANIMOUSLY—and that includes the votes of Rep. Michele Bachmann and Rep. Ron Paul.

      • smrstrauss
        March 6, 2014 at 6:03 pm

        Oh, and by the way, IN ADDITION to the links provided above, Kaiploani Hospital is confirming that Obama was born there (want to see the two citations of that too?) and Obama’s Kenyan grandmother NEVER said that he was born in Kenya. She said repeatedly in the taped interview that he was born in Hawaii—want to see the transcript?

      • March 6, 2014 at 8:44 pm

        Hey TROLL glad your back why don’t you go visit Sherriff Joe and have a nice chat, by the way, your so called facts still don’t change that your boy, Obama, lied to Congress, and the PEOPLE about Health Care, Spying, IRS, Benghazi so you wonder why WE don’t believe your ‘facts’.

        Spin on I love it…

      • smrstrauss
        March 7, 2014 at 1:28 am

        Re: ” go visit Sherriff Joe and have a nice chat,..”

        Here is what the National Review thinks of Sheriff Joe:

        http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/292780/conspiracy-again-editors

        And Sheriff Joe’s claims are not believed by Ann Coulter or Glenn Beck, or MItt Romney or Paul Ryan or Gingrich or Santorum or Huckabee.

        It is true that Obama was wrong on many statements that he made, but that does not make him born in a foreign country. There are plenty of US-born liars and people who make mistakes. More importantly, it certainly does not make the Republican former governor of Hawaii a liar, and she says that Obama was born in Hawaii, And it does not—and cannot—make the birth notices that were sent to the Hawaii newspapers by the DOH of Hawaii in 1961 liars, and they show that Obama was born in Hawaii.

      • March 7, 2014 at 2:36 pm

        Good day TROLL, you still want to defend the indefensible, Obama, albeit your sure seem to know a lot about Ann Coulter or Glenn Beck, or MItt Romney or Paul Ryan or Gingrich or Santorum or Huckabee, for someone who hates the GOP or conservatives. This is what makes your credibility diminish. Keep up the spin your digging a deeper hole each time you speak. By the way TROLL, I’m an independent/conservative I think both parties are full of shit, just the dems are Socialist and it looks as if the right is Fascist. Fuck me that like saying which Muslim group is better when they both want to kill you.
        Anyway fuck both of yall…

      • smrstrauss
        March 7, 2014 at 11:51 pm

        Notice that damndems has once again not answered the facts. It is not hard to find out what Mitt Romney, Paul Ryan, Huckabee, Gingrich and Santorum have said about the claim that Obama was born in a foreign country—and they all have said that they do not believe it. Ann Coulter, Glenn Beck and the National Review have gone further and called birthers CRAZY.

        It is easy for sensible people to see why they call birthers crazy. For Obama to have been born in a foreign country: (1) Obama’s mother would have had to have traveled to that country at great expense and risk of stillbirth—which was relatively high at the time; (2) She would have had to have SMUGGLED Obama back into the USA since there is no record of his being entered on her passport or getting a US visa (and why would she would want to do so, at the risk of going to jail, when IF he had been born in a foreign country he could simply be nationalized and get all the rights of a US citizen except the ability to become president?); and (3) She would (despite, according to birthers, his being born in a foreign country) have had to have gotten the officials in Hawaii (at the time under a Republican governor) to issue a birth certificate for Obama that said on it that he was born in Kapiolani Hospital in Honolulu, Hawaii.

        No wonder the Conservative and Republican leaders do not believe the birther fantasy.

      • March 8, 2014 at 2:44 am

        TROLL you can believe whatever your want dipshit, I don’t care. I think he is a Commy and should ask Putin for advice how to further his agenda. Obama is not born with American values because he didn’t grow up in America during his childhood until he moved back to Hawaii because his dad left his mother… yada yada He may have been born in Hawaii (or not) you decide But dont ask me to believe YOU or your exhaustive so called facts.

        troll on obamabot

      • smrstrauss
        March 8, 2014 at 3:17 am

        Re: “But dont ask me to believe YOU or your exhaustive so called facts.”

        Actually, I’m not asking YOU to believe anything. I post the facts, and many links that confirm them (see above), for the benefit of a rational person who may visit this site. As for your claim that Obama does not have “American values.” Well several million people agree with you, but that was not enough to win the election against Mitt Romney, so Obama (who really is a Natural Born Citizen, as the facts that show he was born in Hawaii and the facts about the meaning of the term both show) was re-elected president on November 6, 2012.

        You, and millions of others, have the right not to like him. But he is the president, and will remain the president until his term ends in January 2017—and if anything were to happen to him, Joe Biden (whom conservatives would be likely to like even less than Obama) would become president.

      • March 8, 2014 at 3:30 am

        AS Rush Limbaugh has stated many times why Obama was re-elected is simple – mass amounts of Republicans stayed home and didn’t vote for Romney… Go read the transcript… I did vote for him and was shocked to see how many stupid ass Americans voted for the Socialist Obama. Of course I never fell for Obama BS the first time like YOU did.. Now you may like Socialism – but here in Dallas Texas we don’t plow that row. So where are you from?

        And what is that suppose to mean if “anything were to happen to him” is that some racist remark your hiding behind?

        So name one thing Obama has done positively, please say Obamacare because that is the only thing he has accomplished and that is a complete failure…

      • smrstrauss
        March 12, 2014 at 9:42 am

        Re: ” name one thing Obama has done positively, please say Obamacare because that is the only thing he has accomplished and that is a complete failure…”

        Answer: Obamacare stops insurance companies from denying coverage to people with pre-existing conditions and allows children to be covered on their parents’ insurance policies until the age of 26, and ultimately it will bring insurance coverage to 35-45 MILLION Americans who did not have insurance before. Obama got us out of Iraq and will get us out of Afghanistan, in contrast to George W. Bush who got us into both of those wars. Obama provided cash to keep GM and Chrysler afloat, and ultimately they paid the USA back for those loans and equity purchases AT A PROFIT to the USA. Obama tightened regulations on keeping the air clean and the water clean, in contrast to George Bush, who weakened those regulations.

        Re: “what is that suppose to mean if “anything were to happen to him” is that some racist remark your hiding behind? ”

        Answer: Don’t be gullible. Perhaps you are not one of them, but there are people who do want something to happen to Obama. They should know that first, what they desire is immoral, and second if anything were to happen to Obama, Biden would take over, and the conservatives would hate him even more than Obama.

      • March 12, 2014 at 1:42 pm

        By the way TROLL, I work for an insurance company I see what all the people say about obummercare everyday and nobody likes it but the sickest of the sick. I will give you that MAYBE 5 million have signed up, so now you know how many sick ass people we have in America that didn’t have coverage. I get that they needed to have a net, but Obama fucked over 30 million – so far – to get that small minority covered. Now since you have no fucking clue about how these exchanges are working you can’t say how great they are. Whites, Blacks, and Mexicans are pissed off at Obama and they tell me they can’t pay for this Obamacare EVERYDAY!!!!

        In fact have you signed up for Obamacare? Did you give the gov permission to access your bank account on a monthly basis to make sure you can pay your ACA bill, or that you can’t quit your job without approval from the IRS before your resign – so you can pay your ACA bill. Or the best one yet – Congress voted to repeal the TAX for the first year but Obummer has vowed to VETO upon arrival. That should make some of your dems friends wonder if Obama has the best interest of the country or an agenda. I bet you like the agenda don’t ya TROLL….

      • smrstrauss
        March 13, 2014 at 8:01 pm

        Re: “SOCIAL SECURITY (a liberal invention) would not be around when we were old because WE knew it WAS going broke that was back in 1985.”

        Social Security is not going broke. Simple fixes such as gradually increasing the hiring age can handle the problem.

    • smrstrauss
      March 12, 2014 at 3:57 pm

      Re: “so now you know how many sick ass people we have in America that didn’t have coverage.’

      In the next presidential election, you will have the right to vote for someone who (like Mitt Romney) vowed to repeal Obamacare, or somebody who will maintain it. You have indicted who you will vote for. Others will vote for the candidate who will maintain Obamacare. I wonder who will win?

      • March 12, 2014 at 6:12 pm

        Yea lets see who will win…….. They had to vote on it to see what’s in it.. and it was a dem majority that pushed it through. Now you can see what is in it.. and you never answered my question. Did you signup for Obamacare???? See how smartass deflected that simple question…

      • March 12, 2014 at 6:15 pm

        Oh you should read my last two post so you can get up to speed about your beloved leader and what he is saying and doing to the people… It’s good stuff you will like it.. go ahead mikey try it..

      • smrstrauss
        March 13, 2014 at 2:00 am

        Re: “Did you signup for Obamacare???? ”

        I am on Medicare—another liberal innovation.

      • March 13, 2014 at 1:28 pm

        Soon to go broke as well… enjoy

      • March 13, 2014 at 1:48 pm

        You know I am GenX and we were smart enough to know that Medicare, medicade and especially SOCIAL SECURITY (a liberal invention) would not be around when we were old because WE knew it WAS going broke that was back in 1985. During that time frame people of your generation were creating all this liberal BS and cried about unfairness and PC crap creating lawsuits while devaluing the basic traditions of Americans who don’t want the gov in our business. Since 85 I have seen Mexicans quadruple because they refuse to close the border, PC lawsuits, Racism elevated in the last 5 years (during Obama) than ever before (including you), housing lose value by 30%, NO JOBS (of course thats all bushs fault) get over that BS, your boy has been in business 5 years and fucked up more shit than Carter.

        Yet idiots like you praise a fucked up broken system and ride into the sunset saying how great it was while leaving pure shit for the following generation behind you. So thank you fucked up OLD person who spent your kids inheritance laughing all the way to the bank…. Thats your idea of a liberal fucked up Social So-Called SECURITY…

      • smrstrauss
        March 13, 2014 at 8:02 pm

        Re: “SOCIAL SECURITY (a liberal invention) would not be around when we were old because WE knew it WAS going broke that was back in 1985.”

        Answer: Social Security is not going broke. Simple fixes such as gradually increasing the retiring age and gradually reducing the inflation adjustment can handle the problem

      • March 14, 2014 at 12:19 pm

        BULLSHIT your just full of crap and in denial. Like I said thanks asshole for your libtard programs that all suck.. Name one government program that is EFFICIENT? JUST ONE!!!

      • March 19, 2014 at 12:18 pm

        This is just for you smartass:

        For those of you who don’t know …at the very bottom of this article the attorney who authored this is John Wayne’s daughter, also a Graduate of USC…

        SSN 042-68-4425

        Well, Well, Well, it looks like
        someone thoroughly checked this out! I was
        wondering who was going to
        do research into B.O.’s SSN’s numbers…
        ———————
        Jean Paul Luwig or Barak Hussein Obama? SSN# 042-68-4425
        WOW, read this, it’s short – very interesting.
        An intensive investigation has
        revealed the identity of the man whose
        Social Security Number (SSN) is
        being used by President Obama:
        Jean Paul Ludwig, who was born in
        France in 1890,immigrated to the United
        States in 1924,and was assigned
        SSN 042-68-4425 (Obama’s current SSN) rec’d
        on or about March 1977.
        Mr. Ludwig lived most of his adult
        life in Connecticut . Because of that,
        his SSN begins with the digits
        042, which are among only a select few
        reserved for Connecticut
        residents.
        Barack H. Obama never lived or
        worked in that state! Therefore, there is no
        reason on earth for his
        SSN to start with the digits 042. None whatsoever!
        Now comes the best part! J. P.
        Ludwig spent the final months of his life in
        Hawaii, where he died.
        Conveniently, Obama’s grandmother, Madelyn Payne
        Dunham, worked
        part-time in the Probate Office in the Honolulu Hawaii
        Courthouse, and
        therefore had access to the SSNs of deceased individuals.
        The Social Security Administration
        was never informed of Ludwig’s death,
        and because he never received
        Social Security benefits there were no
        benefits to stop and therefore,
        no questions were ever raised.
        The suspicion, of course, is that
        Dunham, knowing her grandson was not a
        U.S. Citizen, either because he
        was born in Kenya or became a citizen of
        Indonesia upon his adoption by
        Lolo Soetoro, simply scoured the probate
        records, until she found
        someone, who died who was not receiving Social
        Security benefits, and
        selected Mr.. Ludwigs Connecticut SSN for Obama. Just
        wait until Trump
        gets past the birth certificate and onto the issue of
        Barry O’s use of
        a stolen SSN You will see leftist heads exploding, because
        they will
        have no way of defending Obama.
        Although many Americans do not
        understand the meaning of the term “natural
        born” there are few who do
        not understand that if you are using someone
        else’s SSN it is a clear
        indication of fraud.
        Let’s all get this information out
        to everybody on our mailing lists.
        If the voters of this great nation
        can succeed in bringing this lying,
        deceitful, cheating, corrupt,
        impostor to justice it will be the biggest
        and best news in decades for
        our country and the world.
        If you can just say “oh well; ho hum”
        after reading this you get what you
        deserve.
        “In God We
        Trust.”

        Aissa Wayne
        __________________________________
        LAW OFFICES OF AISSA WAYNE
        30765 P.C.H., Suite 203, Malibu, CA 90265
        Tel: (310) 457-9999
        Fax: (310) 457-0643

      • smrstrauss
        March 20, 2014 at 3:11 pm

        Re: “SSN# 042-68-4425.”

        Yes that WAS Obama’s SS number, the one that he published, but he has a new one now—not that it matters.

        BUT SSN# 042-68-4425—was not Ludwig’s SS number.

        Ludwig’s SS number was 045-26-8722.

        http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2011/06/details-details/

      • March 21, 2014 at 12:56 am

        Why did he have a FAKE NUMBER? Why are you defending it so much what do you have at stake?

      • March 21, 2014 at 1:18 am

        So it’s OK to give out a FAKE NUMBER then go back and give out another number and tell us this one is better.
        How many SSN were YOU
        issued???????????????????

        How is their a simple “mix up” in so many areas?

        It’s amazing how people like you will blindly accept the truth/lies from your guy without question, do you always blindly follow the liberal political agenda without question? Say what you want about the right, at least they accept everyone – that’s turned out to be there downfall; while independents (like me) questions all parties. Surprisingly the left has a my way or the highway attitude, and people like you will not change even when empirical evidence raises questions to what should never been arisen – and then give some punk ass reason what really happened???? You can relay that crap to your friends bro, not happening here..

        Do you have any critical thinking process, or does your mantra overwhelm your conscience.thought process? .

      • March 21, 2014 at 1:30 am

        What is really surprising is your not really a smart ass, your more a troll, that just likes to run across sites spewing liberal lies and when I call bullshit you change the subject. So that is not what I call smart, of course I don;t know where your from since you don’t state that like I have. So I will assume your from humm…. thinking…. My first guess would be New York, but that would insult a few yankess I know. So the next guess would be Chicago. If not maybe on west coast, I have met some real dip shits out there boy,

        So back to you being a dumbass – I think when ever you reply/respond to any of my postings you should call me SIR. Even if your in your 80’s your mentality is so fucked up you really only respect a person who tells you what to do.

      • smrstrauss
        March 21, 2014 at 7:48 am

        Re: “So it’s OK to give out a FAKE NUMBER then go back and give out another number and tell us this one is better.
        How many SSN were YOU
        issued???????????????????”

        First, recall that Obama’s SS number WAS NOT Ludwig’s number as claimed. The two are different numbers, so Obama did not “steal” Ludwig’s number.

        Second, the claim that it was a false number. NO, it wasn’t. The CT SS number was caused by a data entry error. (Did you think that Social Security clerks never made mistakes in entering data? Did you think that when a SS clerk entered the zip code of the applicant wrong it would not generate a SS number from a place other than where the application was made???)

        Well, Obama’s address in Hawaii was in zip code 96814, and the zip code for Danbury, CT. is 06814.

        Re: “How many SSN were YOU issued???????????????????”

        Answer: How many were you issued? Have you checked? It turns out that millions upon millions of people were issued multiple SS numbers and incorrect numbers due mainly to SS clerk data entry errors. (Did you think that they never made mistakes???)

        http://www.securityworldnews.com/2010/08/12/20-million-americans-have-multiple-social-security-numbers-associated-with-their-name/

        Re: “people like you will not change even when empirical evidence raises questions to what should never been arisen…”

        Answer: The main cause of your nightmares has been the repeated LIES by birther sites.

        For example:

        1) Birthers said that Obama’s draft card was forged, and indeed it was forged, but Obama did not post his draft card, nor did any representative of Obama—so who do you think forged it? (Okay, I’ll make it easy—the guy who posted it.)

        (2) Birthers have said that Obama became a citizen of Indonesia—but a telephone call to the Indonesian Embassy shows that he was never an Indonesian citizen. Why do you suppose that the birthers did not call the Indonesian embassy to check?

        (3) Birthers said that Obama’s Kenyan grandmother said that he was born in Kenya—but the transcript of the call shows that she said that he was BORN IN HAWAII—why do you suppose they did not quote her accurately and in fact cut off the tape recording of the call on their sites just before she said “born in Hawaii, where his father was studying at the time.” Why do you suppose they did that?

        (4) Birther sites did not tell you about SS Administration clerks making lots of mistakes and that a single digit entered wrong in the zip code would generated a SS number from a place other than where it was applied from. Why do you suppose they did not tell you that?

        And then, of course, there are the “four facts” that the original article was about: The claim that a birth certificate could not say “African”—when in Hawaii you could use any word you wanted to describe your race. The claim that Kenya did not exist in 1961—when it had been called The Kenya Colony since 1920. The claim that Kapolani Hospital had a different name from on Obama’s birth certificate (when the birth certificates for the Nordyke Twins who were born one day later shows exactly the same hospital name), and the complete lie that Obama’s book said that his father fought in WWII, when the book clearly says his GRANDFATHER fought in WWII.

        And then there was the claim that Obama used Ludwig’s SS number, when 042-68-4425 is not the same as 045-26-8722.

      • March 21, 2014 at 2:08 pm

        First I was issued 1 SSN just like YOU. Clerks file what is submitted, don’t be a fool. Do they make mistakes but few I’m sure. I’m so glad you follow birther sites so well, hell you know more about them than I do, I think that’s funny shit.

        So you didn’t answer the question AGAIN – WHAT DO YOU HAVE TO GAIN BY DEFENDING OBAMA???

      • smrstrauss
        March 21, 2014 at 3:03 pm

        Re: “First I was issued 1 SSN just like YOU. Clerks file what is submitted, don’t be a fool.”

        Answer: Actually, you have to look into your FILE to find the amount of SS numbers in your file. If and when you do, you may find several different SS numbers generated over the years by SS clerks. Millions of people have them. (See the link to Security World News above.)

        Re: “So you didn’t answer the question AGAIN – WHAT DO YOU HAVE TO GAIN BY DEFENDING OBAMA???”

        Answer. I’m not defending Obama. I am refuting birther LIES. It amuses me to do so. What rational people should ask is what is the MOTIVE——what do birther sites have to gain–by making all of these lies:

        (1) Birthers have said that Obama became a citizen of Indonesia—but a telephone call to the Indonesian Embassy shows that he was never an Indonesian citizen. Why do you suppose that the birthers did not call the Indonesian embassy to check?

        (2) Birthers said that Obama’s Kenyan grandmother said that he was born in Kenya—but the transcript of the call shows that she said that he was BORN IN HAWAII—why do you suppose they did not quote her accurately and in fact cut off the tape recording of the call on their sites just before she said “born in Hawaii, where his father was studying at the time.” Why do you suppose they did that?

        (3) Birther sites posted videos of Obama that claimed to show that he said “I was born in Kenya”—but you cannot see his mouth move and the originals of those videos have been found, and they do not say “I was born in Kenya..”” Why do you suppose that they forged and posted those videos? (Ditto, by the way, for three forged “Kenyan birth certificates.” And what do you suppose was the motive for forging them??)

        (4) Birther sites said that Obama spent “millions” on hiding his birth certificate. But Obama showed his birth certificate and did not spend a cent on hiding anything. And in fact, as birther sites did not tell their readers, there wasn’t even one lawsuit for Obama’s birth certificate or for records, not one. There were lawsuits to keep Obama off of ballots, but NO lawsuits for his birth certificate or records of any kind. Why do you suppose that birther sites implied that there were lawsuits for Obama’s BC—when there weren’t ANY???

        (5) Birther sites said that Obama’s records are “sealed,” but they are not sealed. They are covered under the ordinary state and federal privacy laws, and Mitt Romney and John McCain and previous presidents did not release similar records either. In fact, no president or presidential candidate has released his school or college transcripts (a few showed grade point averages). Bush’s transcript, BTW, was leaked by Yale, but Bush did not release it. And Clinton and Reagan and Carter and Ford and Nixon and LBJ, etc., etc.—-did not show their school or college records either.

        And (6) the constant repetition ‘the birth certificates are forged,” and “anyone can see that the birth certificates are forged”—are all birther lies too. And they have the same motives as the lies shown above.

        Birthers have not shown all the real experts who have said that there is nothing wrong with Obama’s birth certificate, nor have they told the readers on birther sites that the officials in Hawaii of BOTH parties have repeatedly confirmed that they sent the birth certificates to Obama and confirmed ALL the facts on the copy that the White House put online are EXACTLY the same as on what they sent to him. And they have not explained the research on the Xerox Workstation either:

      • March 22, 2014 at 2:39 pm

        Don’t remember reading the political affiliations of all of these but it sounds good to me, and makes about as much sense as some of the other solutions being thrown around in Washington and state capitols.

        In 1865 a Democrat shot and killed Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States.

        In 1881 a left wing radical Democrat shot James Garfield, President of the United States who later died from the wound.

        In 1901 a member of a worker’s socialist club turned radical anarchist, named Leon Czolgosz, shot William McKinley, President of the United States who later died of gangrene, caused by the bullet wound. Czolgosz believed there was a great injustice in American society, an inequality which allowed the wealthy to enrich themselves by exploiting the poor (sound familiar?). He concluded that the reason for this was the structure of government itself. Of course, those in charge of the government at the time were Republicans.

        In 1963 a radical left wing socialist shot and killed John F. Kennedy, President of the United States.

        In 1975 a left wing radical Democrat fired shots at Gerald Ford, President of the United States.

        In 1983 a registered Democrat shot and wounded Ronald Reagan, President of the United States.

        In 1984 James Hubert, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 22 people in a McDonalds restaurant.

        In 1986 Patrick Sherrill, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 15 people in an Oklahoma post office.

        In 1990 James Pough, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 10 people at a GMAC office.

        In 1991 George Hennard, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 23 people in a Luby’s cafeteria.

        In 1995 James Daniel Simpson, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 5 coworkers in a Texas laboratory.

        In 1999 Larry Asbrook, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 8 people at a church service.

        In 2001 a left wing radical Democrat fired shots at the White House in a failed attempt to kill George W. Bush, President of the US.

        In 2003 Douglas Williams, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 7 people at a Lockheed Martin plant.

        In 2007 a registered Democrat named Seung – Hui Cho, shot and killed 32 people in Virginia Tech.

        In 2010 a mentally ill registered Democrat named Jared Lee Loughner, shot Rep. Gabrielle Giffords and killed 6 others.

        In 2011 a registered Democrat named James Holmes, went into a movie theater and shot and killed 12 people.

        In 2012 Andrew Engeldinger, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 7 people in Minneapolis.

        In 2013 a registered Democrat named Adam Lanza, shot and killed 26 people in a school in Newtown, CT.

        As recently as Sept 2013, an angry Democrat shot 12 at a Navy ship yard.

        One could go on, but you get the point, even if the media does not.

        Clearly, there is a problem with Democrats and guns.

        Not one NRA member, Tea Party member, or Republican conservative was involved in any of these shootings and murders (except as a target!).

        SOLUTION: It should be illegal for Democrats or socialists to own guns.

      • March 22, 2014 at 2:41 pm

        No your just an BOdrone that likes to spin out of facts that disagree with your facts. I love it people disagree with your guy – I sure as hell disagree with his administration and YOU…

  1. June 14, 2014 at 5:50 pm
  2. June 14, 2014 at 4:42 pm
  3. May 1, 2014 at 2:06 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: